Brookfield Multiplex Constructions LLC v (1) DIFC Investments LLC (2) Dubai International Financial Centre Authority [2016] DIFC CFI 020 (28 July 2016)
The pursuit of proceedings in the non-DIFC Dubai Court for appointment of an expert does not breach the arbitration agreement, as such proceedings are procedural and do not affect substantive rights; therefore, there is no basis for granting an anti-suit injunction. DIFC Courts have jurisdiction to grant anti-suit injunctions even if the seat of arbitration is not DIFC, but would only exercise such jurisdiction in exceptional circumstances, which are not present here.
- Citation
- [2016] DIFC CFI 020
- Parties
- Claimant: Brookfield Multiplex Constructions LLC; Defendant: DIFC Investments LLC; Defendant: Dubai International Financial Centre Authority
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Proceedings / Judgment on Interim Anti Suit Injunction and Declarations
- Outcome
- Interim anti-suit injunction refused; declaration of binding arbitration agreement to be made if undertakings not given.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Arbitration Agreements, Jurisdiction of DIFC Courts, Interim Remedies, Preservation of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brookfield Multiplex Constructions LLC
Claimant
DIFC Investments LLC
Defendant
Dubai International Financial Centre Authority
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Proceedings / Judgment on Interim Anti Suit Injunction and Declarations
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuit of proceedings in non-DIFC Dubai Courts breaches the arbitration agreement
- 2 Whether DIFC Courts have jurisdiction to grant anti-suit injunctions
- 3 Whether the seat of arbitration is DIFC or non-DIFC Dubai
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuit of proceedings in the non-DIFC Dubai Court for appointment of an expert does not breach the arbitration agreement, as such proceedings are procedural and do not affect substantive rights; therefore, there is no basis for granting an anti-suit injunction. DIFC Courts have jurisdiction to grant anti-suit injunctions even if the seat of arbitration is not DIFC, but would only exercise such jurisdiction in exceptional circumstances, which are not present here.
Court Disposition
Interim anti-suit injunction refused; declaration of binding arbitration agreement to be made if undertakings not given.
Orders
- Refusal of interim anti-suit injunction sought by Brookfield
- Declaration of binding arbitration agreement between Brookfield and DIFCI if undertakings not given
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment