Keshav Global Trading LLC (2) Keshav Global Private Limited v ETG Commodities Holdings Limited [2025] DIFC CFI 069 (29 August 2025)

Keshav Global Trading LLC (2) Keshav Global Private Limited v ETG Commodities Holdings Limited [2025] DIFC CFI 069 (29 August 2025)

The court abridged the time for filing evidence in response to the Security for Costs Application, finding the Claimant had adequate time to respond and that both applications should be determined at the CMC Hearing for efficiency.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] DIFC CFI 069
Parties
Claimant: Keshav Global Trading LLC; Claimant: Keshav Global Private Limited; Defendant: ETG Commodities Holdings Limited
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
29 August 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Order (case Management Directions, Security for Costs, Unless Order)
Outcome
interlocutory orders made; no final disposition of claim
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Case Management, Unless Order, Abridgment of Time
Civil Procedure Security for Costs Case Management Unless Order Abridgment of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Keshav Global Trading LLC

Claimant

Keshav Global Private Limited

Claimant

ETG Commodities Holdings Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Order (case Management Directions, Security for Costs, Unless Order)

  1. 1 Whether the time for filing evidence in response to the Security for Costs Application should be abridged
  2. 2 Whether the Security for Costs Application and Unless Order Application should be determined at the CMC Hearing
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant has adequate time to respond to applications

Ratio Decidendi

The court abridged the time for filing evidence in response to the Security for Costs Application, finding the Claimant had adequate time to respond and that both applications should be determined at the CMC Hearing for efficiency.

Court Disposition

interlocutory orders made; no final disposition of claim

Orders

  • Time for Claimant’s responsive evidence to Security for Costs Application abridged to 4pm on 3 September 2025
  • Time for Defendant’s evidence in reply abridged to 4pm on 20 September 2025