Femke Company v (1) Feliks Corporation (2) Feliks Middle East [2015] DIFC SCT 017 (24 August 2015)

Femke Company v (1) Feliks Corporation (2) Feliks Middle East [2015] DIFC SCT 017 (24 August 2015)

The Claimant failed to establish a contractual or legal relationship with the Defendants under the Consulting Service Agreement, as the Claimant was not a party to the agreement and did not provide sufficient evidence of payment or liability. Therefore, the Defendants are not legally responsible to pay the Claimant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] DIFC SCT 017
Parties
Claimant: FEMKE COMPANY; Defendant: FELIKS CORPORATION; Defendant: FELIKS MIDDLE EAST
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
24 August 2015
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim rejected
Legal Topics
Consulting Service Agreement, Corporate Identity, Contractual Liability
Contract Law Consulting Service Agreement Corporate Identity Contractual Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FEMKE COMPANY

Claimant

FELIKS CORPORATION

Defendant

FELIKS MIDDLE EAST

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant had a contractual or legal relationship with the Defendants under the Consulting Service Agreement
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants are liable to pay the Claimant under the alleged agreement

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant failed to establish a contractual or legal relationship with the Defendants under the Consulting Service Agreement, as the Claimant was not a party to the agreement and did not provide sufficient evidence of payment or liability. Therefore, the Defendants are not legally responsible to pay the Claimant.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected

Orders

  • The Claimant’s Claim is rejected.