Femke Company v (1) Feliks Corporation (2) Feliks Middle East [2015] DIFC SCT 017 (24 August 2015)
The Claimant failed to establish a contractual or legal relationship with the Defendants under the Consulting Service Agreement, as the Claimant was not a party to the agreement and did not provide sufficient evidence of payment or liability. Therefore, the Defendants are not legally responsible to pay the Claimant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] DIFC SCT 017
- Parties
- Claimant: FEMKE COMPANY; Defendant: FELIKS CORPORATION; Defendant: FELIKS MIDDLE EAST
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Consulting Service Agreement, Corporate Identity, Contractual Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FEMKE COMPANY
Claimant
FELIKS CORPORATION
Defendant
FELIKS MIDDLE EAST
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant had a contractual or legal relationship with the Defendants under the Consulting Service Agreement
- 2 Whether the Defendants are liable to pay the Claimant under the alleged agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant failed to establish a contractual or legal relationship with the Defendants under the Consulting Service Agreement, as the Claimant was not a party to the agreement and did not provide sufficient evidence of payment or liability. Therefore, the Defendants are not legally responsible to pay the Claimant.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected
Orders
- The Claimant’s Claim is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment