Fusun v Funske [2015] DIFC SCT 081 (22 June 2015)

Fusun v Funske [2015] DIFC SCT 081 (22 June 2015)

The Defendant received the full amount due under the employment contract in accordance with DIFC Employment Law No.4 of 2005, as amended, and provided insufficient evidence for further claims; there is no statutory law on unfair dismissal in the DIFC.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] DIFC SCT 081
Parties
Claimant: FUSUN; Defendant: FUNSKE
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
22 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Dispute / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Both the Claimant’s claim and the Defendant’s counterclaims are dismissed.
Legal Topics
Termination of Employment, End of Service Benefits, Unfair Dismissal, Counterclaims, Jurisdiction of Small Claims Tribunal
Employment Law Termination of Employment End of Service Benefits Unfair Dismissal Counterclaims Jurisdiction of Small Claims Tribunal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FUSUN

Claimant

FUNSKE

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Employment Dispute / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant received all dues upon termination
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant was unfairly dismissed
  3. 3 Whether the Defendant is entitled to further compensation or benefits

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant received the full amount due under the employment contract in accordance with DIFC Employment Law No.4 of 2005, as amended, and provided insufficient evidence for further claims; there is no statutory law on unfair dismissal in the DIFC.

Court Disposition

Both the Claimant’s claim and the Defendant’s counterclaims are dismissed.

Orders

  • The Claimant’s Claim is dismissed
  • The Defendant’s Counterclaims are dismissed