Genager v Greet Limited [2016] DIFC SCT 161 (30 November 2016)

Genager v Greet Limited [2016] DIFC SCT 161 (30 November 2016)

The Defendant was found to be the Claimant's employer based on the Greet Limited Employment Agreement, conduct of the parties, and the doctrine of apparent authority. The Defendant is liable for unpaid salary, statutory penalty under Article 18, visa fines, and court fees.

Citation
[2016] DIFC SCT 161
Parties
Claimant: Granger; Defendant: Greet Limited
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
30 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Claim allowed
Legal Topics
Unpaid Wages, Employment Relationship, Apparent Authority, Visa Fines, Employment Termination, Statutory Penalties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Granger

Claimant

Greet Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Judgment After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant was employed by the Defendant or by Gen Trade
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant is liable for unpaid salary for June 2016
  3. 3 Whether Article 18 penalty under DIFC Employment Law applies

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant was found to be the Claimant's employer based on the Greet Limited Employment Agreement, conduct of the parties, and the doctrine of apparent authority. The Defendant is liable for unpaid salary, statutory penalty under Article 18, visa fines, and court fees.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed

Orders

  • The Defendant shall pay the Claimant AED 18,410.84 for unpaid salary from 1 June 2016 to 28 June 2016.
  • The Defendant shall pay the Claimant AED 92,711.73 as a penalty under Article 18(2) of DIFC Employment Law and AED 657.53 per day from the date of judgment until payment is made.