Genager v Greet Limited [2016] DIFC SCT 161 (30 November 2016)
The Defendant was found to be the Claimant's employer based on the Greet Limited Employment Agreement, conduct of the parties, and the doctrine of apparent authority. The Defendant is liable for unpaid salary, statutory penalty under Article 18, visa fines, and court fees.
- Citation
- [2016] DIFC SCT 161
- Parties
- Claimant: Granger; Defendant: Greet Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Claim / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unpaid Wages, Employment Relationship, Apparent Authority, Visa Fines, Employment Termination, Statutory Penalties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Granger
Claimant
Greet Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant was employed by the Defendant or by Gen Trade
- 2 Whether the Defendant is liable for unpaid salary for June 2016
- 3 Whether Article 18 penalty under DIFC Employment Law applies
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant was found to be the Claimant's employer based on the Greet Limited Employment Agreement, conduct of the parties, and the doctrine of apparent authority. The Defendant is liable for unpaid salary, statutory penalty under Article 18, visa fines, and court fees.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- The Defendant shall pay the Claimant AED 18,410.84 for unpaid salary from 1 June 2016 to 28 June 2016.
- The Defendant shall pay the Claimant AED 92,711.73 as a penalty under Article 18(2) of DIFC Employment Law and AED 657.53 per day from the date of judgment until payment is made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment