Henrietta v Halstead Middle East LLC [2017] DIFC SCT 231 (11 October 2017)

Henrietta v Halstead Middle East LLC [2017] DIFC SCT 231 (11 October 2017)

The Claimant failed to provide evidence for entitlement to claimed benefits, bonus, compensation for arbitrary dismissal, or intellectual property use, and DIFC law does not provide for arbitrary dismissal remedies; all claims dismissed for lack of evidence.

Citation
[2017] DIFC SCT 231
Parties
Claimant: Henrietta; Defendant: Halstead Middle East LLC
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
11 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Dispute / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
End of Service Benefits, Bonus Entitlement, Arbitrary Dismissal, Intellectual Property in Employment, Discrimination Claims
Employment Law End of Service Benefits Bonus Entitlement Arbitrary Dismissal Intellectual Property in Employment Discrimination Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henrietta

Claimant

Halstead Middle East LLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Employment Dispute / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to family air tickets on termination
  2. 2 Entitlement to bonus for 2016
  3. 3 Compensation for arbitrary dismissal

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant failed to provide evidence for entitlement to claimed benefits, bonus, compensation for arbitrary dismissal, or intellectual property use, and DIFC law does not provide for arbitrary dismissal remedies; all claims dismissed for lack of evidence.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant’s claims dismissed
  • Claimant to pay DIFC Courts the Court Fees in the sum of AED 3,895.50