Mirifa v (1) Mahur (2) Meison (3) Mepur [2023] DIFC ARB 009 (24 October 2023)
The claimant is entitled to reasonable costs of the WWFO application, assessed at USD 250,000, reflecting deductions for duplication and excessive time, and determined on paper without a hearing as per procedural rules and efficiency.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] DIFC ARB 009
- Parties
- Claimant: Mirifa; Defendant: Mahur; Defendant: Meison; Defendant: Mepur
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Enforcement/costs Assessment / Costs Assessment Following Enforcement Order
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to claimant
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Assessment of Costs, Interim Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mirifa
Claimant
Mahur
Defendant
Meison
Defendant
Mepur
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Enforcement/costs Assessment / Costs Assessment Following Enforcement Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to recover reasonable costs of the application for the WWFO
- 2 Appropriate quantum of costs to be awarded
- 3 Whether a hearing is necessary for costs assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to reasonable costs of the WWFO application, assessed at USD 250,000, reflecting deductions for duplication and excessive time, and determined on paper without a hearing as per procedural rules and efficiency.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to claimant
Orders
- Claimant entitled to recover reasonable costs of the application, assessed at USD 250,000.
- Third Defendant to pay claimant USD 250,000 within 14 days of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment