Mirtu v Miwan Mrut [2023] DIFC CT 271 (21 August 2023)

Mirtu v Miwan Mrut [2023] DIFC CT 271 (21 August 2023)

The judge determined that the Defendant was misnamed due to a common error by self-represented litigants and ordered the correction to save time and avoid delay.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] DIFC CT 271
Parties
Claimant: Mirtu; Defendant: Miwan Mrut
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
21 August 2023
Procedural Posture
Employment Dispute / Interlocutory Order
Outcome
Order granted
Legal Topics
Misnaming of Parties, Correction of Case Title, Small Claims Tribunal Procedure
Employment Law Civil Procedure Misnaming of Parties Correction of Case Title Small Claims Tribunal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mirtu

Claimant

Miwan Mrut

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Employment Dispute / Interlocutory Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was correctly named in the claim form
  2. 2 Whether the case title should be amended to reflect the correct party name

Ratio Decidendi

The judge determined that the Defendant was misnamed due to a common error by self-represented litigants and ordered the correction to save time and avoid delay.

Court Disposition

Order granted

Orders

  • The Defendant shall be renamed as 'Miwan'.
  • The case title shall be amended to 'Mirtu vs Miwan'.