Mojita v Mocka Restaurant [2023] DIFC CT 207 (28 July 2023)
The Defendant is not permitted to deduct visa/recruitment costs from the Claimant due to Article 57(2) of the DIFC Employment Law. The Claimant is entitled to tips in the amount admitted by the Defendant and payment in lieu of two days of public holidays. The Defendant must cancel the Claimant’s visa as the employment relationship has ended.
- Citation
- [2023] DIFC CT 207
- Parties
- Claimant: Mojita; Defendant: Mocka Restaurant
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Dispute Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Unpaid Tips, Public Holiday Pay, Visa Cancellation, Recruitment Cost Deduction, Probationary Period, Employment Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mojita
Claimant
Mocka Restaurant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Employment Dispute Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant can deduct recruitment/visa costs from the Claimant upon resignation during probation
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to unpaid tips
- 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to payment in lieu of public holidays
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant is not permitted to deduct visa/recruitment costs from the Claimant due to Article 57(2) of the DIFC Employment Law. The Claimant is entitled to tips in the amount admitted by the Defendant and payment in lieu of two days of public holidays. The Defendant must cancel the Claimant’s visa as the employment relationship has ended.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant AED 1,661
- Defendant to cancel Claimant’s employment visa
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment