Mursahi (2) Miriyi v Morib [2023] DIFC SCT 349 (17 November 2023)

Mursahi (2) Miriyi v Morib [2023] DIFC SCT 349 (17 November 2023)

There was no misrepresentation or lack of transparency by the Defendant regarding government fees or services. The Agreement and communications made clear the fee structure and scope of services. The Claimants' misunderstanding or change of mind does not entitle them to a refund under the Agreement or relevant law.

Citation
[2023] DIFC SCT 349
Parties
Claimant: Mursahi; Claimant: Miriyi; Defendant: Morib
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
17 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Misrepresentation, Refund of Fees, Contractual Interpretation, Obligations of Service Providers
Contract Law Immigration Law Misrepresentation Refund of Fees Contractual Interpretation Obligations of Service Providers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mursahi

Claimant

Miriyi

Claimant

Morib

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was misrepresentation by the Defendant regarding government fees and services under the Agreement
  2. 2 Whether the Claimants are entitled to a refund and voiding of the Agreement

Ratio Decidendi

There was no misrepresentation or lack of transparency by the Defendant regarding government fees or services. The Agreement and communications made clear the fee structure and scope of services. The Claimants' misunderstanding or change of mind does not entitle them to a refund under the Agreement or relevant law.

Court Disposition

Claims dismissed

Orders

  • The Claimants’ claims shall be dismissed.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.