Sarinton Trading Inc v Mr Andreas Michael Reichmuth [2013] DIFC CFI 020 (17 December 2013)

Sarinton Trading Inc v Mr Andreas Michael Reichmuth [2013] DIFC CFI 020 (17 December 2013)

The Court was satisfied that the condition precedent in the Assignment Agreement had been fulfilled, entitling the Claimant to the assignment of the Defendant's interests under the Sale and Purchase Agreements, subject to the consent of Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited.

Citation
[2013] DIFC CFI 020
Parties
Claimant: Sarinton Trading Inc; Defendant: Mr Andreas Michael Reichmuth
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
17 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Default Judgment
Outcome
Default judgment for the Claimant
Legal Topics
Assignment Agreement, Sale and Purchase Agreement, Default Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sarinton Trading Inc

Claimant

Mr Andreas Michael Reichmuth

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Default Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the condition precedent in the Assignment Agreement was fulfilled
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant's interests under the Sale and Purchase Agreements were validly assigned to the Claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was satisfied that the condition precedent in the Assignment Agreement had been fulfilled, entitling the Claimant to the assignment of the Defendant's interests under the Sale and Purchase Agreements, subject to the consent of Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited.

Court Disposition

Default judgment for the Claimant

Orders

  • Declaration that, subject to the consent of Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited, the Defendant's interests under the Sale and Purchase Agreements have been wholly assigned to the Claimant.
  • Costs of the claim and application for default judgment to be subject to detailed assessment before the DIFC Courts Registrar.