Naima v Nadine [2024] DIFC SCT 112 (13 May 2024)
The Defendant is liable for the full annual membership fee because she accepted the terms and conditions, which clearly stated a minimum one-year commitment, and the right to payment survives cancellation as per the contract.
- Citation
- [2024] DIFC SCT 112
- Parties
- Claimant: Naima; Defendant: Nadine
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Digital Contracts, Membership Agreements, Subscription Terms, Accrued Rights, Cancellation and Termination Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Naima
Claimant
Nadine
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant is liable to pay the annual membership fee despite cancelling membership early
- 2 Whether the Defendant was bound by the digital agreement and terms and conditions
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant is liable for the full annual membership fee because she accepted the terms and conditions, which clearly stated a minimum one-year commitment, and the right to payment survives cancellation as per the contract.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- The Defendant shall pay the Claimant AED 2,220.
- The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the DIFC Courts’ filing fee of AED 367.25.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment