Nadheer v Nasrullah [2024] DIFC SCT 277 (19 September 2024)
The Claimant filed the claim before the 14-day statutory period for payment had expired, and the Defendant settled all amounts before the penalty could accrue. Article 19(4)(a) of the DIFC Employment Law requires the court to waive penalties during the period a dispute is pending. Therefore, the Defendant is not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] DIFC SCT 277
- Parties
- Claimant: Nadheer; Defendant: Nasrullah
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Dispute Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Employment Termination, Settlement Agreement, Delay in Payment of Entitlements, Visa Cancellation, Penalty for Late Payment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nadheer
Claimant
Nasrullah
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Employment Dispute Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant is liable to pay damages for delay in payment of employment entitlements under DIFC Employment Law and the Employment Contract
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant filed the claim before the 14-day statutory period for payment had expired, and the Defendant settled all amounts before the penalty could accrue. Article 19(4)(a) of the DIFC Employment Law requires the court to waive penalties during the period a dispute is pending. Therefore, the Defendant is not liable for the claimed penalty.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The Claimant’s claim is dismissed.
- The Defendant shall immediately cancel the Claimant’s employment visa.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment