Natale v Noraiz [2024] DIFC SCT 278 (21 August 2024)
The Defendant is only entitled to deduct reasonable costs for painting, cleaning, and pest control as per the lease agreement. The Defendant's claimed deductions exceeded what was contractually allowed. The Claimant agreed to pay AED 1,500 for these services, so the balance of the deposit must be returned.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] DIFC SCT 278
- Parties
- Claimant: Natale; Defendant: Noraiz
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Leasing Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Security Deposit Deductions, Lease Termination, DIFC Leasing Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Natale
Claimant
Noraiz
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Leasing Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant was entitled to deduct the security deposit for alleged damages and services beyond the lease agreement terms
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the return of the security deposit
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant is only entitled to deduct reasonable costs for painting, cleaning, and pest control as per the lease agreement. The Defendant's claimed deductions exceeded what was contractually allowed. The Claimant agreed to pay AED 1,500 for these services, so the balance of the deposit must be returned.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant AED 3,500
- Defendant to pay Claimant DIFC Courts’ filing fee of AED 367.25
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment