Oleksei (2) Olesja (3) Oliff (4) Olexi (5) Olinijia (6) Olimipiana (7) Olley v (1) Olorun (2) Olov (3) Olumiji (4) Oluluaboe (5) Olushegun [2026] DIFC ARB 005 (28 January 2026)
The DIFC Courts lack jurisdiction to grant the interim injunction sought because no suitable precautionary measures are sought within the DIFC, there is no connection to the DIFC, and the relief would have no effect within the DIFC. The enforcement principle does not apply as the arbitral award sought would not be enforceable in the DIFC. The application does not fall within Article 15.4 of Dubai Law No. 2 of 2025.
- Citation
- [2026] DIFC ARB 005
- Parties
- Applicant: Oleksei; Applicant: Olesja; Applicant: Oliff; Applicant: Olexi; Applicant: Olinijia; Applicant: Olimipiana; Applicant: Olley; Respondent: Olorun; Respondent: Olov; Respondent: Olumiji; Respondent: Oluluaboe; Respondent: Olushegun
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Related Application / Interim Application (injunction and Postponement) in Court of First Instance
- Outcome
- Applicants' injunction application dismissed; First Respondent's postponement application dismissed; costs reserved for future decision.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Relief in Support of Arbitration, Jurisdiction of DIFC Courts, Precautionary Measures, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oleksei
Applicant
Olesja
Applicant
Oliff
Applicant
Olexi
Applicant
Olinijia
Applicant
Olimipiana
Applicant
Olley
Applicant
Olorun
Respondent
Olov
Respondent
Olumiji
Respondent
Oluluaboe
Respondent
Olushegun
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Related Application / Interim Application (injunction and Postponement) in Court of First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether DIFC Courts have jurisdiction under Article 15.4 of Dubai Law No. 2 of 2025 to grant interim injunctive relief in support of foreign-seated arbitration where no connection to the DIFC exists
- 2 Whether the orders sought constitute suitable precautionary measures within the DIFC
- 3 Whether the American Cyanamid test for interim injunctions is satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The DIFC Courts lack jurisdiction to grant the interim injunction sought because no suitable precautionary measures are sought within the DIFC, there is no connection to the DIFC, and the relief would have no effect within the DIFC. The enforcement principle does not apply as the arbitral award sought would not be enforceable in the DIFC. The application does not fall within Article 15.4 of Dubai Law No. 2 of 2025.
Court Disposition
Applicants' injunction application dismissed; First Respondent's postponement application dismissed; costs reserved for future decision.
Orders
- Applicants’ Injunction Application is dismissed.
- First Respondent’s Postponement Application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment