Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC v Manghat [2023] ADGMCFI 0021 (14 November 2023)
The ADGM Court has broad statutory case management powers under Rule 8(1) of the Court Procedure Rules, which are sufficient to permit orders for coordinated case management and concurrent trials of related proceedings. The Court's procedures are not limited by the absence of such powers in on-shore UAE courts or by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] ADGMCFI 0021
- Parties
- Claimant: Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC; Defendant: Prasanth Manghat; Claimant/applicant: NMC Healthcare Limited (in administration) (subject to a deed of company arrangement); Claimant/applicant: NMC Holding Limited (in administration); Claimant/applicant: Richard Dixon Fleming (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants/Applicants); Claimant/applicant: Benjamin Thom Cairns (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants/Applicants); Defendant/respondent: Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty; Defendant/respondent: Bank of Baroda
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/corporate Insolvency) / Interlocutory Application—case Management and Coordination of Parallel Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application adjourned; Court determines it has the power to make the order sought but defers decision on whether to exercise that power.
- Legal Topics
- Case Management Powers, Concurrent Proceedings, Jurisdictional Coordination, Fraudulent Trading, Wrongful Trading, Accessory Liability, Breach of Duty, Conspiracy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC
Claimant
Prasanth Manghat
Defendant
NMC Healthcare Limited (in administration) (subject to a deed of company arrangement)
Claimant/applicant
NMC Holding Limited (in administration)
Claimant/applicant
Richard Dixon Fleming (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants/Applicants)
Claimant/applicant
Benjamin Thom Cairns (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants/Applicants)
Claimant/applicant
Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty
Defendant/respondent
Bank of Baroda
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/corporate Insolvency) / Interlocutory Application—case Management and Coordination of Parallel Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the ADGM Court have the power under Rule 8(1) of the Court Procedure Rules to order coordinated case management and concurrent trial of related claims?
- 2 Should the Court exercise its power to coordinate or consolidate proceedings in light of parallel litigation in other jurisdictions?
- 3 What is the appropriate procedure for managing duplicative or overlapping claims in different forums?
Ratio Decidendi
The ADGM Court has broad statutory case management powers under Rule 8(1) of the Court Procedure Rules, which are sufficient to permit orders for coordinated case management and concurrent trials of related proceedings. The Court's procedures are not limited by the absence of such powers in on-shore UAE courts or by common law limitations. The question of whether to exercise this power in the present case is adjourned pending resolution of a stay application, given the existence of parallel proceedings and the need to avoid procedural chaos.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned; Court determines it has the power to make the order sought but defers decision on whether to exercise that power.
Orders
- Determination that the Court has power to make the order sought under Rule 8(1) of the ADGM Court Procedure Rules.
- Decision on whether to exercise the power adjourned pending a stay application to be heard in December 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment