Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC v Manghat [2024] ADGMCFI 0020 (06 December 2024)
Train of inquiry disclosure is justified and ordered due to exceptional circumstances, gravity of allegations, lack of primary evidence, and off-line communications; extension of time for Bank of Baroda's standard disclosure granted to 20 January 2025; consequential deadlines for further disclosure and expert evidence applications set; costs to be costs in the case; disclosure statements to refer to 'control' and follow specified content.
- Citation
- [2024] ADGMCFI 0020
- Parties
- Claimant: Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC; Defendant: Prasanth Manghat; Claimant: NMC Healthcare Limited (in administration) (subject to a deed of company arrangement); Claimant: NMC Holding Limited (in administration); Claimant: Richard Dixon Fleming (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants); Claimant: Benjamin Thom Cairns (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants); Defendant: Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty; Defendant: Bank of Baroda
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial and Civil / Case Management Conference; Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Applications for train of inquiry disclosure granted; extension of time for Bank of Baroda's standard disclosure granted; costs in the case; consequential deadlines set; disclosure statements ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Train of Inquiry Disclosure, Case Management, Expert Evidence, Costs, Fraud, Conspiracy, Kyc/aml Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC
Claimant
Prasanth Manghat
Defendant
NMC Healthcare Limited (in administration) (subject to a deed of company arrangement)
Claimant
NMC Holding Limited (in administration)
Claimant
Richard Dixon Fleming (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants)
Claimant
Benjamin Thom Cairns (in his capacity as Joint Administrator of the First and Second Claimants)
Claimant
Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty
Defendant
Bank of Baroda
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial and Civil / Case Management Conference; Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Extension of time for disclosure
- 2 Train of inquiry disclosure
- 3 Restoration of disclosure applications
Ratio Decidendi
Train of inquiry disclosure is justified and ordered due to exceptional circumstances, gravity of allegations, lack of primary evidence, and off-line communications; extension of time for Bank of Baroda's standard disclosure granted to 20 January 2025; consequential deadlines for further disclosure and expert evidence applications set; costs to be costs in the case; disclosure statements to refer to 'control' and follow specified content.
Court Disposition
Applications for train of inquiry disclosure granted; extension of time for Bank of Baroda's standard disclosure granted; costs in the case; consequential deadlines set; disclosure statements ordered.
Orders
- Bank of Baroda to complete standard disclosure by 20 January 2025.
- Applications for further or specific disclosure in JA Claim by 25 April 2025; in ADCB Claim by 28 February 2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment