Techteryx Ltd v Aria Commodities DMCC & Ors
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Posture
- Contempt Application / Adjournment and Directions Order
- Language
- English
More details
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court adjourned the Committal Hearing and made detailed directions requiring pre-hearing liaison and affidavit disclosure by Matthew William Brittain concerning payments to specified entities and the sources of those payments.
Court disposition
Committal Hearing adjourned; directions made
Orders
- The Committal Hearing shall be adjourned to 26 October 2026 with an estimated length of hearing of 4 days.
- The Committal Hearing shall take place in person in the Court save that Mr Peto KC has permission to attend remotely.
- The parties shall liaise to agree directions leading to the Committal Hearing no later than 4pm (GST) on 7 September 2026; failing agreement, proposals shall be sent to the Court by 4pm (GST) on 8 September 2026 for determination on paper.
- Matthew William Brittain shall, to the best of his ability, swear and serve an affidavit by 4pm (GST) on 7 September 2026 providing specified information in respect of all moneys paid to Quinn Emanuel, Horizons, Gall, Campbells and FTI Consulting.
02
Material facts
Parties
TECHTERYX LTD.
ClaimantARIA COMMODITIES DMCC
First Defendant/first RespondentMATTHEW WILLIAM BRITTAIN
Second RespondentMASHREQ BANK PSC
DefendantEMIRATES NBD BANK PJSC
DefendantABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK PJSC
DefendantARIA BIO INDUSTRIES FZE
Third RespondentAmounts and remedies
- USD Value of Transferred Funds Mentioned in Earlier WFO: USD 456,000,000
- Committal Hearing Estimated Length of Hearing (days): 4
03
Procedural history
Posture
Contempt Application / Adjournment and Directions Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Committal Hearing should be adjourned
- 02
What directions should be made pending the Committal Hearing
- 03
What affidavit disclosure should be provided by Matthew William Brittain
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Claimant applied for permission to amend the Contempt Application, sought to require compliance with disclosure obligations, and opposed the adjournment application.
- Respondent
- The First and Second Respondents applied to adjourn the Final Hearing of the Contempt Application and sought further directions.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order of H.E. Justice Michael Black dated 26 August 2026
A court may adjourn a hearing and give case-management directions to prepare a matter for final hearing.
- 02
Paragraph 4 of the order dated 26 August 2026
A respondent may be required to swear and serve an affidavit providing detailed financial tracing and disclosure information.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court adjourned the Committal Hearing and made detailed directions requiring pre-hearing liaison and affidavit disclosure by Matthew William Brittain concerning payments to specified entities and the sources of those payments.
Court disposition
Committal Hearing adjourned; directions made
- The Committal Hearing shall be adjourned to 26 October 2026 with an estimated length of hearing of 4 days.
- The Committal Hearing shall take place in person in the Court save that Mr Peto KC has permission to attend remotely.
- The parties shall liaise to agree directions leading to the Committal Hearing no later than 4pm (GST) on 7 September 2026; failing agreement, proposals shall be sent to the Court by 4pm (GST) on 8 September 2026 for determination on paper.
- Matthew William Brittain shall, to the best of his ability, swear and serve an affidavit by 4pm (GST) on 7 September 2026 providing specified information in respect of all moneys paid to Quinn Emanuel, Horizons, Gall, Campbells and FTI Consulting.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
Claim No. DEC 001/2025
IN THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS
IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
BETWEEN
TECHTERYX LTD.
Claimant
and
(1) ARIA COMMODITIES DMCC
First Defendant/First Respondent
(2) MATTHEW WILLIAM BRITTAIN
Second Respondent
(3) MASHREQ BANK PSC (4) EMIRATES NBD BANK PJSC (5) ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK PJSC
Defendants
and
(6) ARIA BIO INDUSTRIES FZE
Third Respondent
ORDER WITH REASONS OF H.E. JUSTICE MICHAEL BLACK
UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Michael Black KC dated 28 February 2025 (the “WFO”) granting inter alia the following orders:
(1) a proprietary injunction prohibiting Aria Commodities DMCC (“Aria DMCC”) from disposing of, dealing with, or diminishing cash or assets to the value of the sum of USD 456,000,000 transferred to Aria DMCC or the traceable proceeds thereof;
(2) a worldwide freezing injunction, prohibiting Aria DMCC from removing from Dubai any of its assets which are in Dubai up to the value of USD 456,000,000 or in any way disposing of, dealing with or diminishing the value of any of its assets whether in or outside Dubai up to the same value; and
(3) ancillary disclosure orders inter alia requiring Aria DMCC to inform the Applicant’s legal representatives of (i) any onward dealings with any of the funds received from Legacy Trust Company and First Digital Trust Limited, including as to who was the ultimate beneficiary of such dealings; (ii) the current, value, location and details of all of the sums received including as to who is currently the ultimate beneficiary of such funds; and (iii) the current, value, location and details of any traceable proceeds including as to who is currently the ultimate beneficiary of such assets
AND UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Michael Black dated 7 August 2025 inter alia continuing the injunctions made under the WFO until further order of the Court
AND UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Michael Black dated 17 October 2025 (the “October Disclosure Order”) in response to the Applicant’s Application No. DEC-001-2025/12, directing Aria DMCC to remedy its non-compliance with the disclosure orders in paragraphs 14-16 of the WFO by inter alia (a) Mr Brittain swearing and submitting a further affidavit providing all of the information required by paragraph 14(2) of the WFO and (b) Aria DMCC, among other things, explaining the complete onward flow of moneys and their traceable proceeds from the payments out of the its bank accounts
AND UPON the Claimant's Application No. DEC-001-2025/21 dated 30 April 2026 for permission to amend the Contempt Application (the “Amendment Application”) in the form of the Amended Application Notice and draft Particulars of Contempt filed together with the application
AND UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Michael Black dated 6 May 2026 giving directions in respect of the Contempt Application, including that the Final Hearing be listed for 5 days beginning on 27 July 2026
AND UPON the Claimant’s Application No. DEC-001-2025/22 dated 13 May 2026 seeking an order requiring the First Defendant to remedy its non-compliance with paragraph 17(2) of the Order dated 28 February 2025 (the “Remedy Application”)
AND UPON the Order of H.E. Justice Michael Black dated 30 June 2026 in respect of, inter alia , the application of paragraph 17(2) of the Orders (the “30 June Order”)
AND UPON the Respondents’ Application No. DEC-001-2025/28 dated 17 July 2026 to adjourn the Final Hearing of the Contempt Application and for further directions (the “Adjournment Application”)
AND UPON the Claimant sending amended draft Particulars of Contempt to the First and Second Respondents on 17 July 2026
AND UPON hearing Counsel for the Claimant and Counsel for the First and Second Respondents in respect of the Adjournment Application at the hearing on 27 July 2026
AND UPON hearing Counsel for the Claimant and the Second Respondent, acting for himself and on behalf of the First Respondent, in respect of the Amendment Application on the same date
AND UPON the Court having determined, in the course of hearing the Adjournment Application, the proper interpretation and effect of paragraph 4(b) of the 30 June Order
AND UPON the Amended Order with Reasons of H.E. Justice Michael Black dated 25 August 2026
AND UPON hearing Counsel for the Applicant and Counsel for the Respondent at a hearing held before H.E. Justice Michael Black on 26 August 2026 (the “Hearing”)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Committal Hearing shall be adjourned to 26 October 2026 with an estimated length of hearing of 4 days.
2. The Committal Hearing shall take place in person in the Court save that Mr Peto KC has permission to attend remotely.
3. The parties shall liaise with a view to agreeing directions leading to the Committal Hearing no later than 4pm (GST) on 7 September 2026 . In default of agreement, the parties shall communicate their proposals to the Court by 4pm ( GST) on 8 September 2026 and the Court will determine the appropriate directions on paper.
4. Matthew William Brittain shall, to the best of his ability, swear and serve an affidavit by 4pm (GST) on 7 September 2026 , which must:
(a) provide the following information in respect of all moneys paid to Quinn Emanuel, Horizons, Gall, Campbells and FTI Consulting:
(i) the amounts that have been paid to each of them;
(ii) the dates of such payments;
(iii) the details of the bank accounts from which any moneys were paid to each of them;
(iv) a full explanation of the ultimate sources of these payments, including for each bank account from which moneys have been paid to Quinn Emanuel, Horizons, Gall, Campbells or FTI Consulting:
a. details of the original sources from which any moneys which have been paid into those accounts are ultimately derived, including the identity of the ultimate beneficial owner of such moneys; and
b. an explanation of how those accounts were funded, in what amount(s), and when;
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.