Shanda Games Ltd (Appellant) v Maso Capital Investments Ltd and others (Respondents) (Cayman Islands)
The expression 'fair value' in section 238 of the Cayman Islands Companies Law does not require a pro rata valuation without a minority discount. The general principle is to value the shares as a minority holding unless there is an indication to the contrary. The Board upheld the Court of Appeal's decision that a minority discount is generally applicable, but rejected a bright-line rule that it must always apply. On interest, the Board held that the judge's discretionary mid-point approach was permissible and not contrary to principle.
- Citation
- [2020] UKPC 2
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Shanda Games Ltd; Respondent/appellant: Maso Capital Investments Ltd, Blackwell Partners LLC - Series A, Crown Managed Accounts SPC (on behalf of Crown/Maso Segregated Portfolio)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (privy Council) From Cayman Islands Court of Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Both appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appraisal Rights, Share Valuation, Minority Discount, Interest on Share Value, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shanda Games Ltd
Appellant/respondent
Maso Capital Investments Ltd, Blackwell Partners LLC - Series A, Crown Managed Accounts SPC (on behalf of Crown/Maso Segregated Portfolio)
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (privy Council) From Cayman Islands Court of Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a minority discount should be applied in determining 'fair value' of dissenting shareholders' shares under section 238 of the Cayman Islands Companies Law
- 2 Whether the principles for awarding interest on fair value under section 238 are the same as those for awards of debt or damages
Ratio Decidendi
The expression 'fair value' in section 238 of the Cayman Islands Companies Law does not require a pro rata valuation without a minority discount. The general principle is to value the shares as a minority holding unless there is an indication to the contrary. The Board upheld the Court of Appeal's decision that a minority discount is generally applicable, but rejected a bright-line rule that it must always apply. On interest, the Board held that the judge's discretionary mid-point approach was permissible and not contrary to principle.
Court Disposition
Both appeals dismissed
Orders
- The fair value appeal by the Maso parties is dismissed; the Court of Appeal's order as to the value of the dissenters' shares stands (minority discount applied).
- Shanda's interest appeal is dismissed; the judge's award of interest at 4.295% per annum stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment