John Paterson & Son Ltd v. Corporation of Glasgow [1901] UKHL 855 (29 July 1901)

John Paterson & Son Ltd v. Corporation of Glasgow [1901] UKHL 855 (29 July 1901)

The House of Lords held that the arbitration was informal and based on the arbiter's technical and local knowledge, with both parties having agreed to proceed without legal representation. The arbiter acted within his authority and discretion, and there was no misconduct or procedural irregularity justifying reduction of the decree-arbitral. The appeal was allowed, restoring the original judgment in favour of the Corporation.

Citation
[1901] UKHL 855
Parties
Pursuers (reclaimers and Respondents): John Paterson & Son Limited; Defenders (respondents and Appellants): Corporation of Glasgow
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 July 1901
Procedural Posture
Appeal (house of Lords) / Final Appellate Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment of Inner House reversed; original judgment of Lord Kyllachy restored.
Legal Topics
Arbitration Procedure, Decree Arbitral, Reduction of Arbitral Award, Right to Legal Representation, Scope of Arbitral Authority, Informal Arbitration
Arbitration Contract Law Civil Procedure Arbitration Procedure Decree Arbitral Reduction of Arbitral Award Right to Legal Representation Scope of Arbitral Authority +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Paterson & Son Limited

Pursuers (reclaimers and Respondents)

Corporation of Glasgow

Defenders (respondents and Appellants)

Procedural Posture

Appeal (house of Lords) / Final Appellate Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbiter acted ultra vires by refusing legal representation and by not distinguishing between separate claims in the award
  2. 2 Whether the arbiter was required to hear further evidence or allow legal agents
  3. 3 Whether the decree-arbitral should be reduced for procedural irregularity

Ratio Decidendi

The House of Lords held that the arbitration was informal and based on the arbiter's technical and local knowledge, with both parties having agreed to proceed without legal representation. The arbiter acted within his authority and discretion, and there was no misconduct or procedural irregularity justifying reduction of the decree-arbitral. The appeal was allowed, restoring the original judgment in favour of the Corporation.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment of Inner House reversed; original judgment of Lord Kyllachy restored.

Orders

  • Interlocutor of the Inner House recalled.
  • Judgment of Lord Kyllachy, Ordinary, restored.