UI2024004657 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024004657 (17 September 2025)

UI2024004657 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024004657 (17 September 2025)

The appellant, not being in possession of a CSID or INID on return to the IKR, faces a real risk of serious harm contrary to Article 3 ECHR at internal checkpoints, and the fresh evidence provided does not justify departure from binding country guidance.

Citation
[2025] UKAITUR UI2024004657
Parties
Appellant in UT / Respondent in Ft T: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Respondent in UT / Appellant in Ft T: H A
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 September 2025
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Remaking of Decision After First Tier Tribunal Decision Set Aside
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Article 3 ECHR, Humanitarian Protection, Feasibility of Removal, Identity Documentation, Country Guidance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Appellant in UT / Respondent in Ft T

H A

Respondent in UT / Appellant in Ft T

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Remaking of Decision After First Tier Tribunal Decision Set Aside

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's removal to Iraq/IKR would breach Article 3 ECHR due to lack of identity documentation
  2. 2 Whether the appellant can feasibly be re-documented or access services upon return

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, not being in possession of a CSID or INID on return to the IKR, faces a real risk of serious harm contrary to Article 3 ECHR at internal checkpoints, and the fresh evidence provided does not justify departure from binding country guidance.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed on Humanitarian Protection grounds under Article 3 ECHR.