UI2024004657 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024004657 (17 September 2025)
The appellant, not being in possession of a CSID or INID on return to the IKR, faces a real risk of serious harm contrary to Article 3 ECHR at internal checkpoints, and the fresh evidence provided does not justify departure from binding country guidance.
- Citation
- [2025] UKAITUR UI2024004657
- Parties
- Appellant in UT / Respondent in Ft T: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Respondent in UT / Appellant in Ft T: H A
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Remaking of Decision After First Tier Tribunal Decision Set Aside
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Article 3 ECHR, Humanitarian Protection, Feasibility of Removal, Identity Documentation, Country Guidance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Appellant in UT / Respondent in Ft T
H A
Respondent in UT / Appellant in Ft T
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Remaking of Decision After First Tier Tribunal Decision Set Aside
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's removal to Iraq/IKR would breach Article 3 ECHR due to lack of identity documentation
- 2 Whether the appellant can feasibly be re-documented or access services upon return
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant, not being in possession of a CSID or INID on return to the IKR, faces a real risk of serious harm contrary to Article 3 ECHR at internal checkpoints, and the fresh evidence provided does not justify departure from binding country guidance.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed on Humanitarian Protection grounds under Article 3 ECHR.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment