Hamilton and Others v. Nisbet [1907] UKHL 392 (13 March 1907)
The only width which the Master of Works or, on appeal, the Dean of Guild, is empowered to fix under the Glasgow Building Regulations Act 1900 is the actually existing width of the street.
- Citation
- [1907] UKHL 392
- Parties
- Respondents (appellants in the Court of Session): Hamilton and Others; Appellant (respondent in the Court of Session): Nisbet
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / House of Lords Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Building Regulations, Statutory Interpretation, Municipal Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Hamilton and Others
Respondents (appellants in the Court of Session)
Nisbet
Appellant (respondent in the Court of Session)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / House of Lords Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master of Works or Dean of Guild under the Glasgow Building Regulations Act 1900 can fix a width of street other than the actually existing width.
Ratio Decidendi
The only width which the Master of Works or, on appeal, the Dean of Guild, is empowered to fix under the Glasgow Building Regulations Act 1900 is the actually existing width of the street.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment