Grangemouth Burgh Extension Provisional Order [1904] UKHL 886_1 (23 March 1904)

Grangemouth Burgh Extension Provisional Order [1904] UKHL 886_1 (23 March 1904)

The Commissioners found that the promoters failed to prove the necessity for a Provisional Order as statutory mechanisms already existed and the areas did not require municipal government, thus the preamble was not proved.

Citation
[1904] UKHL 886_1
Parties
Promoter: Burgh of Grangemouth; Objector: County Council of Stirlingshire and Eastern District Committee of Stirlingshire; Objector: Caledonian Railway Company, Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 March 1904
Procedural Posture
Provisional Order Opposition / Hearing Before House of Lords Commissioners
Outcome
Preamble to Provisional Order not proved; application failed.
Legal Topics
Burgh Boundary Extension, Provisional Orders, Jurisdictional Objections, Assessment and Compensation, Water Rights
Local Government Law Administrative Law Burgh Boundary Extension Provisional Orders Jurisdictional Objections Assessment and Compensation Water Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Burgh of Grangemouth

Promoter

County Council of Stirlingshire and Eastern District Committee of Stirlingshire

Objector

Caledonian Railway Company, Limited

Objector

Procedural Posture

Provisional Order Opposition / Hearing Before House of Lords Commissioners

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a Provisional Order was necessary for the extension of the burgh boundaries
  2. 2 Whether statutory procedures under the Burgh Police (Scotland) Acts sufficed
  3. 3 Whether the areas proposed for annexation required municipal government

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioners found that the promoters failed to prove the necessity for a Provisional Order as statutory mechanisms already existed and the areas did not require municipal government, thus the preamble was not proved.

Court Disposition

Preamble to Provisional Order not proved; application failed.