Reid-Blair v London Borough Of Haringey [2003] UKEAT 1134_02_1803 (18 March 2003)

Reid-Blair v London Borough Of Haringey [2003] UKEAT 1134_02_1803 (18 March 2003)

Three of four grounds of appeal and cross-appeal raise arguable points of law and will proceed to a full hearing; the Tribunal's findings on race discrimination are permissible and not subject to interference.

Citation
[2003] UKEAT 1134_02_1803
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Sandra Reid-Blair; Respondent/cross Appellant: London Borough of Haringey
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
18 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing (inter Partes)
Outcome
Three grounds of appeal and cross-appeal permitted to proceed to full hearing; Applicant's appeal on race discrimination dismissed.
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Unlawful Deductions, Holiday Pay, Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sandra Reid-Blair

Applicant/appellant

London Borough of Haringey

Respondent/cross Appellant

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing (inter Partes)

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in dismissing the race discrimination complaint
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in awarding nil compensation for constructive dismissal
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in upholding complaints of unlawful deductions and holiday pay

Ratio Decidendi

Three of four grounds of appeal and cross-appeal raise arguable points of law and will proceed to a full hearing; the Tribunal's findings on race discrimination are permissible and not subject to interference.

Court Disposition

Three grounds of appeal and cross-appeal permitted to proceed to full hearing; Applicant's appeal on race discrimination dismissed.

Orders

  • Chairman to provide notes of Applicant's evidence regarding ES's financial affairs.
  • Evidence from John Austin to be transcribed for appeal hearing.