Arnold Clark Automobiles Ltd v. Stewart & Anor [2005] UKEAT 0052_05_2012 (20 December 2005)
A solicitor's letter detailing the employee's complaint, even if marked 'Without Prejudice' and adversarial in tone, constitutes compliance with s.32 Employment Act 2002 statutory grievance requirements, enabling the tribunal to consider the unfair dismissal claim.
- Citation
- [2005] UKEAT 0052_05_2012
- Parties
- Claimant: Richard Stewart; First Respondent: Barnett Motor Group Limited; Second Respondent: Arnold Clark Group
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision on Compliance With Statutory Grievance Procedures
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Breach of Contract, TUPE Regulations, Statutory Grievance Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Stewart
Claimant
Barnett Motor Group Limited
First Respondent
Arnold Clark Group
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision on Compliance With Statutory Grievance Procedures
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a solicitor's letter marked 'Without Prejudice' constitutes compliance with s.32 Employment Act 2002 grievance requirements
- 2 Whether the statutory grievance procedure requires explicit invocation or use of the word 'grievance'
Ratio Decidendi
A solicitor's letter detailing the employee's complaint, even if marked 'Without Prejudice' and adversarial in tone, constitutes compliance with s.32 Employment Act 2002 statutory grievance requirements, enabling the tribunal to consider the unfair dismissal claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Case remitted to Employment Tribunal for hearing on merits of unfair constructive dismissal complaint
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment