Verma v. Harrogate & District NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2009] UKEAT 0155_09_2105 (21 May 2009)
It was illogical and legally perverse to award counsel's fee but not solicitors' costs for the Pre-Hearing Review; the Claimant is entitled to recover reasonable costs incurred by both counsel and solicitors.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0155_09_2105
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr Verma; First Respondent: Harrogate & District NHS Foundation Trust; Second Respondent: Mrs Jenny Mockford
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Partial Costs Order Following Pre Hearing Review
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Strike Out Applications, Case Management, Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Verma
Claimant
Harrogate & District NHS Foundation Trust
First Respondent
Mrs Jenny Mockford
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Partial Costs Order Following Pre Hearing Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was legally perverse to award counsel's fee but not solicitors' costs
- 2 Appropriateness of costs order following a hopeless strike-out application
Ratio Decidendi
It was illogical and legally perverse to award counsel's fee but not solicitors' costs for the Pre-Hearing Review; the Claimant is entitled to recover reasonable costs incurred by both counsel and solicitors.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Respondents to pay Claimant's reasonable costs of and occasioned by the Pre-Hearing Review, including counsel and solicitors' fees.
- Respondents to pay Claimant's costs in the appeal in the sum of £4,954 plus VAT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment