Practice Direction (Employment Appeal Tribunal - Procedure) 2018 [2018] UKEAT EAT_PD_2018 (19 December 2018)
The Practice Direction sets out binding procedural requirements for all appeals to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, including the form and content of Notices of Appeal, strict time limits, case management, evidence rules, and the overriding objective of just and efficient resolution.
- Citation
- [2018] UKEAT EAT_PD_2018
- Parties
- Not Specified: Not specified
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Practice Direction / Issuance of Procedural Rules
- Outcome
- Practice Direction issued and in force from 19 December 2018, superseding previous directions.
- Legal Topics
- Employment Appeal Tribunal Procedure, Appeal Process, Case Management, Time Limits, Notice of Appeal Requirements, Interim Applications, Evidence, Fresh Evidence, Skeleton Arguments, Costs, Listing and Hearings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Not specified
Not Specified
Procedural Posture
Practice Direction / Issuance of Procedural Rules
Legal Issues
- 1 What procedures govern appeals to the Employment Appeal Tribunal?
- 2 What are the requirements for instituting an appeal?
- 3 How are time limits and case management handled in EAT appeals?
Ratio Decidendi
The Practice Direction sets out binding procedural requirements for all appeals to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, including the form and content of Notices of Appeal, strict time limits, case management, evidence rules, and the overriding objective of just and efficient resolution.
Court Disposition
Practice Direction issued and in force from 19 December 2018, superseding previous directions.
Orders
- All appeals to the EAT must comply with this Practice Direction unless specific directions are given in a particular case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment