Colquhoun v. Glasgow Faculty of Procurators' Widows' Fund Society [1908] UKHL 454 (17 March 1908)
The statutory contract created by the 1833 Act entitled a member of the Faculty who became a contributor to the Widows' Fund to continue as a contributor and to the benefits of the Fund, even after ceasing to be a member of the Faculty, unless he renounced, redeemed, or forfeited under the express statutory grounds. There was no express or implied statutory provision that expulsion from the Faculty resulted in forfeiture of rights under the Fund.
- Citation
- [1908] UKHL 454
- Parties
- Appellants (pursuers and Reclaimers): James Colquhoun, his wife, and children; Respondents (defenders and Respondents): Glasgow Faculty of Procurators' Widows' Fund Society
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (house of Lords) / Final Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order of the First Division reversed.
- Legal Topics
- Expulsion From Professional Society, Statutory Contract Rights, Forfeiture of Benefits, Interpretation of Insurance Statutes, Membership Qualifications, Professional Misconduct and Consequences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Colquhoun, his wife, and children
Appellants (pursuers and Reclaimers)
Glasgow Faculty of Procurators' Widows' Fund Society
Respondents (defenders and Respondents)
Procedural Posture
Appeal (house of Lords) / Final Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expulsion from the Faculty of Procurators results in forfeiture of rights and benefits under the Widows' Fund Society as a contributor
- 2 Whether the statutory contract under the 1833 Act impliedly requires continued membership in the Faculty for entitlement to benefits
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory contract created by the 1833 Act entitled a member of the Faculty who became a contributor to the Widows' Fund to continue as a contributor and to the benefits of the Fund, even after ceasing to be a member of the Faculty, unless he renounced, redeemed, or forfeited under the express statutory grounds. There was no express or implied statutory provision that expulsion from the Faculty resulted in forfeiture of rights under the Fund.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order of the First Division reversed.
Orders
- The minute or resolution of the Society dated 4th February 1901 is reduced.
- It is found and declared as concluded for the appellants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment