Bamieh v Eulex (Kosovo) & Ors [2018] UKEAT 0268_16_0119 (19 January 2018)
EULEX Kosovo does not have domestic legal personality in the UK for the purposes of employment law, as no Order in Council has been made and Article 15a of the Joint Action does not confer such personality. The Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction over claims against EULEX or its Head of Mission. However, the Tribunal erred in striking out whistleblowing detriment claims against Mr Ratel and Ms Fearon, as there is an exceptionally strong connection between them, Great Britain, and British employment law, conferring extraterritorial jurisdiction for those claims. All other grounds of appeal fail.
- Citation
- [2018] UKEAT 0268_16_0119
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Ms Maria Bamieh; Respondent 2: Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO); Respondent 1,3,5,6: EULEX Kosovo
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Hearing on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
- Legal Topics
- Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Worker/employee Status, Whistleblowing, Vicarious Liability, Legal Personality of International Organisations, Protected Disclosure Detriment, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Maria Bamieh
Appellant/claimant
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)
Respondent 2
EULEX Kosovo
Respondent 1,3,5,6
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Hearing on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Does EULEX Kosovo have domestic legal personality for the purposes of UK employment law?
- 2 Does the Employment Tribunal have territorial jurisdiction over claims against EULEX and individual respondents seconded to Kosovo?
- 3 Is the FCO vicariously liable for acts of individuals seconded to EULEX?
Ratio Decidendi
EULEX Kosovo does not have domestic legal personality in the UK for the purposes of employment law, as no Order in Council has been made and Article 15a of the Joint Action does not confer such personality. The Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction over claims against EULEX or its Head of Mission. However, the Tribunal erred in striking out whistleblowing detriment claims against Mr Ratel and Ms Fearon, as there is an exceptionally strong connection between them, Great Britain, and British employment law, conferring extraterritorial jurisdiction for those claims. All other grounds of appeal fail.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Orders
- Claims against EULEX and its Head of Mission remain struck out for lack of jurisdiction.
- Claims against Mr Ratel and Ms Fearon for whistleblowing detriment reinstated; Tribunal has jurisdiction over these claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment