Pike v Somerset County Council & Anor [2008] UKEAT 0046_08_0310 (3 October 2008)
The appropriate comparator pool is teachers who retire and return to work (returners), as only they are subject to the post-retirement rule. The exclusion of part-time returners from pensionable service has a statistically significant disparate adverse impact on women, establishing indirect sex discrimination. The Employment Tribunal erred in selecting a wider pool and striking out the claim.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0046_08_0310
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mrs Pike; First Respondent/employer: Somerset County Council; Second Respondent: Secretary of State for Education & Skills (Teachers' Pension Scheme)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Strike Out Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal judgment reversed; case remitted for hearing on justification.
- Legal Topics
- Indirect Sex Discrimination, Equal Pay, Part Time Workers, Pension Entitlement, Selection of Comparator Pool
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Pike
Appellant/claimant
Somerset County Council
First Respondent/employer
Secretary of State for Education & Skills (Teachers' Pension Scheme)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Strike Out Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate comparator pool for assessing indirect sex discrimination in the Teachers' Pension Scheme post-retirement rule?
- 2 Does the exclusion of part-time returners from pensionable service have a disparate adverse impact on women?
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate comparator pool is teachers who retire and return to work (returners), as only they are subject to the post-retirement rule. The exclusion of part-time returners from pensionable service has a statistically significant disparate adverse impact on women, establishing indirect sex discrimination. The Employment Tribunal erred in selecting a wider pool and striking out the claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal judgment reversed; case remitted for hearing on justification.
Orders
- Case remitted to Judge Macmillan for expedited hearing of the Claimant's case and Respondents' justification defence.
- Respondents to serve witness evidence within 14 days; Claimant to respond within 14 days thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment