Frederiksen & Anor v Revenue and Customs (CASE MANAGEMENT - Application to Amend Statement of Case - Application for disclosure against applicant - Redaction - Restriction on use of disclosed documents by HMRC - Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 s 17) [2025] UKFTT 854 (TC) (9 July 2025)
Disclosure of confidential documents is ordered; HMRC's use of disclosed documents cannot be restricted to the proceedings due to s.17 CRCA 2005; redaction of irrelevant/confidential information is permitted; Trustees are allowed to amend grounds of appeal as delay is justified and prejudice to HMRC is slight compared to injustice to Trustees.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 854
- Parties
- First Appellant: Boris FrederiksEN as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Alpha Insurance A/S; Second Appellant: Boris Frederiksen as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Qudos Insurance A/S; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Case Management Order
- Outcome
- Disclosure application granted; collateral use restriction refused; redaction permitted; amendment application granted.
- Legal Topics
- Insurance Premium Tax, Disclosure, Redaction, Collateral Use, Amendment of Grounds of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boris FrederiksEN as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Alpha Insurance A/S
First Appellant
Boris Frederiksen as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Qudos Insurance A/S
Second Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Case Management Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether disclosure of confidential documents by the Trustees should be ordered
- 2 Whether HMRC's use of disclosed documents should be restricted to the proceedings (collateral use)
- 3 Whether redaction of irrelevant/confidential information is permissible
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of confidential documents is ordered; HMRC's use of disclosed documents cannot be restricted to the proceedings due to s.17 CRCA 2005; redaction of irrelevant/confidential information is permitted; Trustees are allowed to amend grounds of appeal as delay is justified and prejudice to HMRC is slight compared to injustice to Trustees.
Court Disposition
Disclosure application granted; collateral use restriction refused; redaction permitted; amendment application granted.
Orders
- Appellants to disclose redacted documents to Respondents
- Redactions permitted for irrelevant/confidential information
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment