Deutsche Bahn AG & Ors v Morgan Advanced Materials Plc [2013] CAT 23 (24 September 2013)

Deutsche Bahn AG & Ors v Morgan Advanced Materials Plc [2013] CAT 23 (24 September 2013)

Permission to re-amend the Claim Form is granted because all defendants except the Fifth Defendant consented or did not object, and the Fifth Defendant, despite opportunity, did not raise substantive objections but only jurisdictional concerns. The Tribunal found it appropriate to grant permission in all the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] CAT 23
Parties
Claimants: Deutsche Bahn AG & Ors; First Defendant: Morgan Advanced Materials Plc (formerly Morgan Crucible Company Plc); Second Defendant: Schunk GmbH; Third Defendant: Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH; Fourth Defendant: SGL Carbon SE (formerly SGL Carbon AG); Fifth Defendant: Mersen SA (formerly Le Carbone-Lorraine SA); Sixth Defendant: Hoffmann & Co Elektrokohle AG
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 September 2013
Procedural Posture
Competition Appeal Tribunal Proceedings / Application for Permission to Re Amend Claim Form
Outcome
Permission to re-amend claim form granted
Legal Topics
Permission to Amend Pleadings, Jurisdiction Under Regulation (ec) 44/2001, Case Management Directions
Competition Law Civil Procedure Permission to Amend Pleadings Jurisdiction Under Regulation (ec) 44/2001 Case Management Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deutsche Bahn AG & Ors

Claimants

Morgan Advanced Materials Plc (formerly Morgan Crucible Company Plc)

First Defendant

Schunk GmbH

Second Defendant

Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH

Third Defendant

SGL Carbon SE (formerly SGL Carbon AG)

Fourth Defendant

Mersen SA (formerly Le Carbone-Lorraine SA)

Fifth Defendant

Hoffmann & Co Elektrokohle AG

Sixth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Competition Appeal Tribunal Proceedings / Application for Permission to Re Amend Claim Form

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted to re-amend the Claim Form
  2. 2 Effect of defendant's refusal to consent on procedural requirements
  3. 3 Implications of consent or non-consent under Article 24 of Regulation (EC) 44/2001

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to re-amend the Claim Form is granted because all defendants except the Fifth Defendant consented or did not object, and the Fifth Defendant, despite opportunity, did not raise substantive objections but only jurisdictional concerns. The Tribunal found it appropriate to grant permission in all the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Permission to re-amend claim form granted

Orders

  • Claimants granted permission to re-amend the Claim Form as per the draft filed and served on 20 September 2013.
  • Claimants to file one original and ten copies of each of the Re-amended Claim Form and the highlighted version by 4pm on 27 September 2013.