Environment Agency v. Rowan [2007] UKEAT 0060_07_0111 (1 November 2007)
The appeal was allowed on the ground that the Employment Tribunal failed to identify the nature and extent of the substantial disadvantage suffered by the Claimant and did not explain how the proposed adjustment (home-working) would have alleviated that disadvantage. Without such findings, the Tribunal could not properly determine whether the Respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments. The appeal on unfair dismissal was dismissed as the Tribunal was entitled to find that the taped conversations constituted a repudiatory breach and the Claimant did not affirm the contract.
- Citation
- [2007] UKEAT 0060_07_0111
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: The Environment Agency; Respondent/claimant: [Claimant Name Not Provided]
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal (eat) Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; remitted for rehearing before a differently constituted Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Adjustments, Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Burden of Proof, Time Limits for Discrimination Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Environment Agency
Appellant/respondent
[Claimant Name Not Provided]
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal (eat) Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to identify the nature and extent of the substantial disadvantage suffered by the Claimant under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasons for its findings on disability discrimination and reasonable adjustments
- 3 Whether the refusal to allow home-working constituted a failure to make reasonable adjustments
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed on the ground that the Employment Tribunal failed to identify the nature and extent of the substantial disadvantage suffered by the Claimant and did not explain how the proposed adjustment (home-working) would have alleviated that disadvantage. Without such findings, the Tribunal could not properly determine whether the Respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments. The appeal on unfair dismissal was dismissed as the Tribunal was entitled to find that the taped conversations constituted a repudiatory breach and the Claimant did not affirm the contract.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; remitted for rehearing before a differently constituted Tribunal.
Orders
- Appeal allowed on disability discrimination issue.
- Appeal dismissed on unfair dismissal issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment