Oil Ltd v Aldred [1993] UKEAT 755_92_1207 (12 July 1993)
It was open to the majority of the Industrial Tribunal to find, as a question of fact, that Mr Aldred was in Great Britain in accordance with instructions given by his employer, even if the instruction was not express but implicit in the circumstances. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision stands and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 755_92_1207
- Parties
- Respondent / Applicant Below: Mr Aldred; Appellants / Respondent Below: Appellants (Employer)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Payment, Unfair Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal, Section 141 Employment Protection (consolidation) Act 1978
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Aldred
Respondent / Applicant Below
Appellants (Employer)
Appellants / Respondent Below
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Aldred was in Great Britain in accordance with instructions given by his employer on the relevant date under section 141(4) of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978
- 2 Whether Mr Aldred was entitled to a redundancy payment
Ratio Decidendi
It was open to the majority of the Industrial Tribunal to find, as a question of fact, that Mr Aldred was in Great Britain in accordance with instructions given by his employer, even if the instruction was not express but implicit in the circumstances. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision stands and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision of the Industrial Tribunal stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment