Simmette Ltd v Pedelty [1993] UKEAT 13_91_2004 (20 April 1993)
The evidence did not establish that Mrs Pedelty's dismissal was principally for trade union activities or at an appropriate time; the principal reason was redundancy, and the interim award was flawed due to insufficient evidence on both reason and timing.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 13
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Mrs Pedelty; Respondent/appellant: Simmette Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decisions (interim Award and Substantive Hearing)
- Outcome
- First appeal (interim award) allowed; second appeal (substantive hearing) dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Trade Union Activities, Redundancy, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Pedelty
Applicant/appellant
Simmette Limited
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decisions (interim Award and Substantive Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Was Mrs Pedelty unfairly dismissed for trade union activities under Section 58?
- 2 Was the dismissal at an 'appropriate time' as defined by statute?
- 3 Was the principal reason for dismissal redundancy or trade union activity?
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not establish that Mrs Pedelty's dismissal was principally for trade union activities or at an appropriate time; the principal reason was redundancy, and the interim award was flawed due to insufficient evidence on both reason and timing.
Court Disposition
First appeal (interim award) allowed; second appeal (substantive hearing) dismissed.
Orders
- Interim award set aside.
- Appeal against substantive hearing dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment