Greater Manchester Buses North v Heyes [1997] UKEAT 645_96_2102 (21 February 1997)
The tribunal's decision was fundamentally flawed because it failed to set out and apply the correct legal test for unfair dismissal, did not clarify the issues being determined, and did not make adequate findings of fact or reasoning as required.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 645_96_2102
- Parties
- Advocate for Appellants: Miss J Woodward; Solicitors for Appellants: Messrs Horwich Farrelly; Advocate for Respondent: Mr R M L Tyrrell; Solicitors for Respondent: Messrs Maidments
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss J Woodward
Advocate for Appellants
Messrs Horwich Farrelly
Solicitors for Appellants
Mr R M L Tyrrell
Advocate for Respondent
Messrs Maidments
Solicitors for Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal applied the correct legal test for unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether procedural deficiencies rendered the dismissal unfair
- 3 Whether the tribunal adequately identified and addressed the issues in the claim
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal's decision was fundamentally flawed because it failed to set out and apply the correct legal test for unfair dismissal, did not clarify the issues being determined, and did not make adequate findings of fact or reasoning as required.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing
Orders
- The matter is remitted to a differently constituted tribunal for rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment