Tate & Lyle Sugars v Hatter [1998] UKEAT 1176_97_1201 (12 January 1998)
The Tribunal was entitled to find the dismissal unfair due to procedural defects in the disciplinary process, including failure to properly investigate and improper involvement of management in the decision-making process. No arguable point of law was raised on appeal.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 1176_97_1201
- Parties
- Employee/respondent: Mr Hatter; Employer/appellant: Appellants (Employer)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Disciplinary Procedure, Natural Justice, Contributory Fault
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Hatter
Employee/respondent
Appellants (Employer)
Employer/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in finding unfair dismissal despite 100% contributory fault
- 2 Whether the disciplinary process was so flawed as to render the dismissal unfair
- 3 Whether the Tribunal substituted its own view for that of the employer
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to find the dismissal unfair due to procedural defects in the disciplinary process, including failure to properly investigate and improper involvement of management in the decision-making process. No arguable point of law was raised on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No full hearing to be held
- Original Tribunal decision stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment