Babcock Wanson UK Ltd v. Wright [2007] UKEAT 0485_06_2202 (22 February 2007)

Babcock Wanson UK Ltd v. Wright [2007] UKEAT 0485_06_2202 (22 February 2007)

The Tribunal's use of a certificate of correction to resolve substantive disputes over pension loss calculations and life assurance benefits was inappropriate and procedurally deficient, as it failed to address the employer's arguments or provide reasons for its decision. The matter must be remitted to the same Tribunal for reconsideration with proper submissions and reasoning.

Citation
[2007] UKEAT 0485_06_2202
Parties
Respondent (claimant Below): Mr Michael Wright; Appellant (employer): Respondent Company (not named)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision on Compensation
Outcome
Certificate of correction set aside; matter remitted to same Tribunal for reconsideration with directions for further submissions.
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Compensation, Pension Loss, Life Assurance Benefits, Tribunal Procedure
Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Redundancy Compensation Pension Loss Life Assurance Benefits Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Michael Wright

Respondent (claimant Below)

Respondent Company (not named)

Appellant (employer)

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision on Compensation

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in calculating compensation for loss of pension rights and life assurance benefits
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the employer's arguments and provide reasons for its decision
  3. 3 Whether the use of a certificate of correction was appropriate for substantive compensation issues

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's use of a certificate of correction to resolve substantive disputes over pension loss calculations and life assurance benefits was inappropriate and procedurally deficient, as it failed to address the employer's arguments or provide reasons for its decision. The matter must be remitted to the same Tribunal for reconsideration with proper submissions and reasoning.

Court Disposition

Certificate of correction set aside; matter remitted to same Tribunal for reconsideration with directions for further submissions.

Orders

  • Each party to file submissions and supporting documents on pension losses within 14 days.
  • Agreed bundle of documents to be filed within 28 days.