Estephane v. Barts and Royal London NHS Trust [2007] UKEAT 0102_07_2903 (29 March 2007)
Continuous employment for the purposes of unfair dismissal under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 begins when the employee actually starts work, not when the contract is formed. The Claimant's employment began on 14 March 2005, when he attended induction and started work, and ended on 25 January 2006, the date of summary dismissal. Payments for accrued holiday after dismissal do not extend the period of employment. As the Claimant had less than one year's continuous service, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim.
- Citation
- [2007] UKEAT 0102_07_2903
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mr D Estephane; Respondent/employer: Barts and the London NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Continuous Employment, Jurisdiction, Time Limits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr D Estephane
Appellant/claimant
Barts and the London NHS Trust
Respondent/employer
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct start date for continuous employment for the purposes of unfair dismissal under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996?
- 2 What is the correct termination date for the purposes of continuous employment?
- 3 Does the Employment Tribunal have jurisdiction if the employee has less than one year's continuous service?
Ratio Decidendi
Continuous employment for the purposes of unfair dismissal under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 begins when the employee actually starts work, not when the contract is formed. The Claimant's employment began on 14 March 2005, when he attended induction and started work, and ended on 25 January 2006, the date of summary dismissal. Payments for accrued holiday after dismissal do not extend the period of employment. As the Claimant had less than one year's continuous service, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The Employment Tribunal's decision is upheld; the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment