Royal Mail Group Ltd v. Tipper [2008] UKEAT 0615_07_1106 (11 June 2008)
The Employment Tribunal's decision was fundamentally deficient in reasoning and failed to address material evidence and legal issues, making it impossible to assess the merits of the appeal; the case must be remitted for a complete rehearing.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0615_07_1106
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mr Tipper; Respondent/appellant: Employer (not named)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal (eat) Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment on Unfair Dismissal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted to a fresh Tribunal for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Tipper
Claimant/respondent
Employer (not named)
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal (eat) Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment on Unfair Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal provided adequate reasons for its finding of unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether the dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair
- 3 Whether the employer's failure to provide a recording to the claimant rendered the dismissal unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal's decision was fundamentally deficient in reasoning and failed to address material evidence and legal issues, making it impossible to assess the merits of the appeal; the case must be remitted for a complete rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted to a fresh Tribunal for rehearing.
Orders
- Case remitted to a fresh Tribunal for a complete rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment