Symonds (t/a Symonds Solicitors) v Redmond -Ord (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0028_11_1006 (10 June 2011)
The Tribunal's finding that the Claimant did not mention Nepal at the meeting was contrary to the agreed evidence and central to the decision on constructive unfair dismissal; this constituted a material error requiring the appeal to be allowed and the case remitted for rehearing.
- Citation
- [2011] UKEAT 0028_11_1006
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Miss Stephanie Redmond-Ord; Respondent/appellant: Mr Symonds
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Finding of Constructive Unfair Dismissal and Remedy
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing before a fresh Employment Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Constructive Dismissal, Perversity, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Stephanie Redmond-Ord
Claimant/respondent
Mr Symonds
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Finding of Constructive Unfair Dismissal and Remedy
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal made a material finding of fact contrary to agreed evidence
- 2 Whether the finding led to a perverse decision on constructive unfair dismissal
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's finding that the Claimant did not mention Nepal at the meeting was contrary to the agreed evidence and central to the decision on constructive unfair dismissal; this constituted a material error requiring the appeal to be allowed and the case remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing before a fresh Employment Tribunal.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The case is remitted to a fresh Employment Tribunal for full rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment