Stewart v Next Retail Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0011_11_1410 (14 October 2011)
The Tribunal erred in applying a Polkey deduction to the basic award because the dismissal was substantively unfair, not procedurally unfair, and there was no contributory conduct by the claimant. Polkey deductions are not competent from basic awards absent procedural unfairness or contributory conduct.
- Citation
- [2011] UKEAT 0011_11_1410
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Linda Stewart; Respondent/employer: Next Retail Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Full Hearing of Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Compensation, Polkey Deduction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Linda Stewart
Appellant/claimant
Next Retail Ltd
Respondent/employer
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Full Hearing of Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in applying a Polkey deduction to the basic award in a case of substantively unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether a Polkey deduction can be applied to a basic award absent procedural unfairness
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in applying a Polkey deduction to the basic award because the dismissal was substantively unfair, not procedurally unfair, and there was no contributory conduct by the claimant. Polkey deductions are not competent from basic awards absent procedural unfairness or contributory conduct.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Tribunal’s award set aside
- Substitute award of £4,470.46 (basic award of £4,220.46 plus £250 for loss of statutory rights)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment