Clutch Auto Centres v Blakemore (Unfair Dismissal : no sub-topic) [2014] UKEAT 0509_13_0805 (8 May 2014)
On the Claimant's pleaded case, the employment ended on 6 November 2012. He cannot later resile from that position. The Tribunal erred in declaring the employment continued when both parties' cases were that it had ended.
- Citation
- [2014] UKEAT 0509_13_0805
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mr Richard Blakemore; Respondent/appellant: Mr Clutch Autocentres
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Tribunal's declaration set aside; Claimant's claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Wrongful Dismissal, Termination of Employment, Employment Contract Continuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Richard Blakemore
Claimant/respondent
Mr Clutch Autocentres
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant was dismissed or resigned
- 2 Whether the employment contract continued after 6 November 2012
- 3 Effect of pleading unfair dismissal on contract termination
Ratio Decidendi
On the Claimant's pleaded case, the employment ended on 6 November 2012. He cannot later resile from that position. The Tribunal erred in declaring the employment continued when both parties' cases were that it had ended.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Tribunal's declaration set aside; Claimant's claims dismissed.
Orders
- The declaration that the Claimant remains an employee of the Respondent is set aside.
- The Claimant's claims are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment