City Facilities Management (UK) Ltd v Beckett [2014] UKEAT 0527_13_1305 (Unlawful Deduction from Wages : no sub-topic) (13 May 2014)
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to make findings as to what wages were properly payable to the claimant, including whether LWA was included in his salary and at what rate. Reliance on an internal, unticked form not provided to the claimant was not contractually valid. The tribunal's failure to apply proper contractual construction principles and to make necessary findings of fact fatally undermined its decision.
- Citation
- [2014] UKEAT 0527
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Mr Martin Beckett; Appellant/respondent: Respondent (Company not named in extract)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted to a fresh tribunal for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Deduction From Wages, London Weighting Allowance, Contractual Construction, Employment Rights Act 1996, Remittal to Tribunal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Martin Beckett
Respondent/claimant
Respondent (Company not named in extract)
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in determining the claimant's entitlement to London Weighting Allowance (LWA)
- 2 Whether the tribunal failed to make necessary findings of fact regarding wages properly due
- 3 Whether reliance on internal documents not provided to the claimant was legally permissible
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to make findings as to what wages were properly payable to the claimant, including whether LWA was included in his salary and at what rate. Reliance on an internal, unticked form not provided to the claimant was not contractually valid. The tribunal's failure to apply proper contractual construction principles and to make necessary findings of fact fatally undermined its decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted to a fresh tribunal for reconsideration.
Orders
- The matter is remitted to a fresh tribunal to determine afresh the issues of contractual entitlement to LWA and any unlawful deduction from wages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment