Pothecary Witham Weld (a firm) & Anor v. Bullimore & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0158_09_2903 (29 March 2010)
Section 63A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 applies to victimisation claims; the Tribunal was entitled to find that the negative reference was significantly influenced by the claimant's prior protected act; the burden of proof was properly applied; and the statutory instrument inserting s. 63A was not ultra vires.
- Citation
- [2010] UKEAT 0158_09_2903
- Parties
- Appellants: Pothecary Witham Weld and Peter Hawthorne; First Respondent: Miss S A Bullimore; Second Respondent: Sebastians; Intervenor: Equality and Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision on Liability for Victimisation Under Sex Discrimination Act 1975
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Victimisation, Sex Discrimination, Burden of Proof, References for Ex Employees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pothecary Witham Weld and Peter Hawthorne
Appellants
Miss S A Bullimore
First Respondent
Sebastians
Second Respondent
Equality and Human Rights Commission
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision on Liability for Victimisation Under Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 63A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (reverse burden of proof) apply to victimisation claims?
- 2 Was the Employment Tribunal correct in finding victimisation in the provision of a negative reference?
- 3 Is the statutory instrument inserting s. 63A ultra vires?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 63A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 applies to victimisation claims; the Tribunal was entitled to find that the negative reference was significantly influenced by the claimant's prior protected act; the burden of proof was properly applied; and the statutory instrument inserting s. 63A was not ultra vires.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Pothecary Witham Weld and Peter Hawthorne is dismissed.
- The finding of victimisation against the appellants stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment