J Powell and Others v A Gomez Ltd (In administration) and The Secretary of State for Business, Trade and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2025] UKET 2302258/2024 (30 April 2025)
The respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies, entitling claimants to a protective award.
- Citation
- [2025] UKET 2302258/2024
- Parties
- Claimant: J Powell and Others; Respondent: A Gomez Ltd (In administration); Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Trade and Industrial Strategy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Protective award granted in favour of claimants
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Employee Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
J Powell and Others
Claimant
A Gomez Ltd (In administration)
Respondent
The Secretary of State for Business, Trade and Industrial Strategy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies
- 2 Entitlement of claimants to a protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies, entitling claimants to a protective award.
Court Disposition
Protective award granted in favour of claimants
Orders
- A Gomez Ltd (in administration) ordered to pay protective award to claimants
- Secretary of State to pay statutory compensation to claimants as appropriate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment