Price v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 474 (TC) (07 October 2010)
Section 161(1) IHTA requires valuation of the aggregate of the deceased's and spouse's interests as a single item, equivalent to the freehold with vacant possession, without deduction for notional selling costs or liabilities; the appropriate portion is determined per section 161(3).
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 474
- Parties
- Appellant: A. Leolin Price CBE QC; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- HMRC's Determination upheld in principle; valuation points to be referred to Upper Tribunal if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance Tax, Related Property Provisions, Valuation of Property, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. Leolin Price CBE QC
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of 'the appropriate portion of the value of the aggregate of that and any related property' in section 161(1) IHTA
- 2 Whether valuation should be of the sum of individual interests or the aggregated property
- 3 Allowance for notional costs and charged debts in valuation
Ratio Decidendi
Section 161(1) IHTA requires valuation of the aggregate of the deceased's and spouse's interests as a single item, equivalent to the freehold with vacant possession, without deduction for notional selling costs or liabilities; the appropriate portion is determined per section 161(3).
Court Disposition
HMRC's Determination upheld in principle; valuation points to be referred to Upper Tribunal if not agreed.
Orders
- Valuation points (aggregate value, appropriate portion, deduction) to be referred to Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) pursuant to section 222(4A) IHTA if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment