AA110872011 & AA110882011 (unreported) [2012] UKAITUR AA110872011 (14 August 2012)

AA110872011 & AA110882011 (unreported) [2012] UKAITUR AA110872011 (14 August 2012)

The tribunal found that the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish a real risk of persecution on return and therefore did not qualify for asylum under UK law.

Citation
[2012] UKAITUR AA110872011
Parties
Appellant: AA110872011; Appellant: AA110882011
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
14 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Unreported Tribunal Decision
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AA110872011

Appellant

AA110882011

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Unreported Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 whether appellants qualify for asylum under UK law
  2. 2 assessment of risk on return

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish a real risk of persecution on return and therefore did not qualify for asylum under UK law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed