SPOROPTIC POUILLOUX SA v Accuity Ltd (Full Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 13950 (13 June 2014)

SPOROPTIC POUILLOUX SA v Accuity Ltd (Full Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 13950 (13 June 2014)

The complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive or that it had enforceable rights under the Policy.

Citation
[2014] DRS 13950
Parties
Complainant: SPOROPTIC POUILLOUX SA; Respondent: Accuity Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SPOROPTIC POUILLOUX SA

Complainant

Accuity Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive or that it had enforceable rights under the Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied