Activ Technology Ltd v Activ Technology & Mr Alan Jones (Full Decision _No Action) [2017] DRS 18361 (10 March 2017)
The complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the registration was abusive or that the respondent lacked legitimate interests in the domain name.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 18361
- Parties
- Complainant: Activ Technology Ltd; Respondent: Activ Technology; Respondent: Mr Alan Jones
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint denied
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Mark Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Activ Technology Ltd
Complainant
Activ Technology
Respondent
Mr Alan Jones
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the registration was abusive or that the respondent lacked legitimate interests in the domain name.
Court Disposition
Complaint denied
Orders
- No action to be taken regarding the domain name
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment